Vulpes vulpes
The book's red fox, and it sets no binomial. 1-179 names the two foxes together — "the most important are the white and the red fox" — and makes this the scarcer: Vulpes lagopus is "much more numerous," while the red "also lives all along the Arctic and Pacific coasts."
Black fox, cross fox and gray fox are this animal as well: colour morphs the fur trade graded and priced apart, not species. 3-171's table sets one black fox at twenty red and one gray at two, and 1-078's fair returns count all three in one line. Which morph a given "gray fox" was is not recoverable from the page and nothing here decides it — only that the animal under all four words is one.
A reader should not read gray fox as the modern English one: that names Urocyon cinereoargenteus, which is North American and does not occur in the country the book describes.
Bare fox stays on Vulpes, which is where a mention that names no colour belongs.
| part of | Vulpes |
|---|
-
Animalia
taxon79 below
-
Mammalia
taxon40 below
-
Carnivora
taxon25 below
-
Vulpes
taxon2 below
- Vulpes vulpes taxon
-
Vulpes
taxon2 below
-
Carnivora
taxon25 below
-
Mammalia
taxon40 below
| form | ||
|---|---|---|
| red fox | English | |
| red foxes | English | |
| red-fox | English | |
| black fox | English | |
| black foxes | English | |
| cross foxes | English | |
| gray fox | English | |
| gray foxes | English |
- 1-078 uncollated red foxes
- 1-079 uncollated to one red fox, one gray fox or one beaver was equal to twored foxes, one black fox was equal to twenty red foxes, etc. The deta
- 1-089 uncollated cross foxes
- 1-093 uncollated red foxes
- 1-094 uncollated red-fox
- 1-132 uncollated red foxes
- 1-179 uncollated red fox
- 1-180 uncollated red fox